The premise of “Man on a Ledge” naturally calls for a constant assortment
of nausea-inducing visuals; I trust you can decipher the reason why just by
reading the film’s brilliantly blunt title. The film takes a man, takes a ledge
and places the man on top of the ledge; it’s as simple a concept as that one from
a few years back that placed some snakes on a plane – the film’s name escapes
me. At many points throughout “Man on a Ledge,” we look down from the ledge and
over the man’s feet to peer at the street 21 stories below, director Asger Leth
playfully poking away at the audience’s tolerance for eye-crossingly big heights.
As I’m sure you can imagine, this creates some hair-raising suspense and churns
the stomach quite a bit, although the level of this nail-biting intensity is
sadly not high enough to rescue the film from its aura of drabness.
I suppose this is only heightened by the recent release of “Mission:
Impossible – Ghost Protocol,” an action sequel in which director Brad Bird took
Tom Cruise, handed him some high-tech sticking gloves and dangled him off the
100th-plus storey of the Burj Khalifa, aka the tallest building on
planet Earth. That was a tremendously dizzying sequence, a result of excellent
craftsmanship from Mr Bird; unfortunately for Leth, his film can merely wobble
in comparison with “MI4”’s vertigo-provoking sequences and consequently finds
itself hurtling down towards the ground, arms and legs violently flailing, its teeny
tiny brain quickly splattered all across the pavement below; I apologise for
the graphic image, but it seemed necessary.
But Tom Cruise clinging onto the side of a national landmark
is not the only hurdle “Man on a Ledge” clumsily trips over; I shall get to
those later. First, though, I want to tell you why this man is on this ledge.
To begin with, we don’t know why; we simply watch an American man, played by a
mullet-sporting Sam Worthington (“Avatar”), going up to a room on the top floor
of a Manhattan hotel. He orders room service, fails to eat the food, opens the
window, takes a deep breath and climbs his way out to the ledge outside. Our first
thought is that he is going to commit suicide; well, it would be, had the film’s
trailer not given away 90% of the film’s content.
It soon transpires that the man is a fugitive ex-cop named
Nick Cassidy. Nick has recently escaped from prison; his charge was the theft
of a $40 million diamond stolen from corrupt businessman David Englander (Ed
Harris, “The Way Back”), for which Nick was going to serve 25 years. However,
Nick stubbornly claims that he is innocent and that Englander set him up; his
method of proving this is apparently to stand on a ledge, cause a media storm
and attract the attention of every citizen in New York – but that’s only half
the plan; with all eyes on Nick, there are no eyes on the building across the
street, where the diamond Englander reported stolen and missing is sitting in
Englander’s vault, ready to be found by Nick’s brother, Joey (Jamie Bell, “The
Adventures of Tintin”), and Joey’s sexy girlfriend, Angie (Genesis Rodriguez, “Casa
de Mi Padre”).
Aside from the cheering crowd that gathers on the street
below with sadistic watchfulness, Nick’s actions are an irritant for many. For example,
there is negotiator Lydia Mercer (Elizabeth Banks, “The Next Three Days”), whom
Nick specifically asks to come talk to him on the ledge. Lydia is currently on
leave following an incident in which a depressed cop she tried to coax out of
jumping off the Brooklyn Bridge, well, jumped off the Brooklyn Bridge. There’s
also Englander, a cardboard cut-out of a villain, played with shark-eyed intensity
by an oddly committed Harris. While at first uninterested in hearing about the
jumper on the building across the street, Englander’s ears suddenly prick up when
he discovers that the jumper is the man he recently had sent to prison for a
quarter of a century.
The film has a decent cast, and I’m including the usually
charmless Worthington in that mix; surprisingly, he makes for a rather good
leading man here, albeit occasionally stumbling back into the characteristic woodenness
he displayed in “Clash of the Titans” and “Avatar.” Banks is also on fine form,
as are Harris and Bell, who gets to perform some high-tech “Mission: Impossible”-esque
stunts throughout the film; oh look, I’ve somehow managed to circle back to the
“Mission: Impossible” franchise. Unfortunately, thanks to a dodgy, formulaic
script, none of them have much to do outside of standing around and reading clunky
dialogue; writer Pablo Fenjves seems to think in terms of plot points as opposed
to character development and character distinction. As such, the cast is wasted
and can do very little to engage the audience into the narrative, leaving us
feeling indifferent about the advancement and outcome of the story; also, one
would have to be blind, deaf and dumb to wrongly predict any of the increasingly hackneyed
plot points.
I believe many will gain some enjoyment out of “Man on a
Ledge;” it is, after all, slickly directed popcorn fluff that provides moderate
thrills and a twisty turny plot. But I would be lying if I were to say I
enjoyed it to the point where I liked it; I found myself rolling my eyes and
shaking my head on far too often an occasion for me to call it a good movie. I
see it as a slightly less gripping “Phone Booth,” a Joel Schumacher thriller
from 2002; that film also contained a sadistic crowd of bystanders watching the
troubled hero in eager excitement – here, I found the crowd much more difficult
to empathise with.
5/10
This movie looked terrible, glad I didn't see it.
ReplyDelete